The Competing Faces of Mental Health Law: Recovery and Access versus the Expanding Use of Preventive Confinement
University of South Florida
Corine De Ruiter
affiliation not provided to SSRN
February 2, 2011
Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 3, No. 1, 2011
Mental illnesses are an enormously important public health issue. Many nations are struggling to create adequate treatment capacity, based on advances in treatment philosophies, treatment modalities, and the codification of the rights of people with mental illnesses. However, preventive confinement is increasingly used to indefinitely confine classes of individuals based on sometimes substandard clinical testimony on diagnosis and future risk. The expanding use of preventive confinement threatens to draw already scarce resources from the treatment of many people with serious mental illnesses to focus on a handful of individuals thought to be dangerous to society. This has serious implications for the future of public mental health care.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 9
Keywords: Petrila, Ruiter, Competing, faces, mental, health, law, recovery, access, preventive, confinement, publicAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 18, 2011 ; Last revised: June 14, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.266 seconds