The Secret Meaning of Intent
Ross E. Davies
George Mason University School of Law; The Green Bag
February 17, 2011
George Mason Law & Economics Research Paper No. 11-10
At the Supreme Court (and elsewhere) there has long been a wide range of views about the proper way to go about interpreting statutes. From time to time, some of those views are blessed with knowledgeable, articulate, and outgoing proponents. These days the debate is perhaps most vigorous, and certainly most entertaining, between Justice Antonin "Plain Meaning" Scalia and Justice Stephen "Legislative Intent" Breyer. Almost a century ago, the debaters were Justices William R. Day and Joseph McKenna, but with a twist: in one important case they were joined in the debate (in secret) by Congressman James R. Mann, who had some secret legislative history of his own to share.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: ambiguous, Caminetti, committee, Congress, Conroy v. Aniskoff, Brown v. Allen, Copyright Act, Costco v. Omega, democracy, House of Representatives, immoral purpose, legislative history, ordinary meaning, Robert Jackson, Senate, White Slave Traffic, William Brennan
JEL Classification: K2, K21, K23, K40working papers series
Date posted: February 19, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.875 seconds