Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1763422
 


 



On (Cr)edibility: Why Food in the United States May Never be Safe


Denis Stearns


Seattle University School of Law

2010

Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2010
Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 11-06

Abstract:     
Most critiques of regulation are premised on the concepts of “free markets” and “market failures” as justifying, or not, the need for government interventions and control of the marketplace. Using the market for food as an example, this article questions not only the possibility of a buyer being a free actor when buying food, but also whether it is meaningful to speak in terms of a “free” market at all. One centerpiece of this questioning is the author’s coining of the term “(cr)edibility” to stand for the twinned ideas of credibility and edibility as defining the nature of all commercial food exchange. It is “(cr)edibility” that consumers seek in the food that they buy and eat, but it is just this “(cr)edibility” that the market can never deliver; this is the real “market failure” that must be understood when examining market for food.

This article additionally interrogates the idea of food safety by opening the question of whether a rational economic actor in a free market for food can reasonably be expected to invest in improving the safety of the food products he makes and sells. It is precisely the lack of (cr)edibility in the market – i.e., the absence of reliable quality signals, the lack of traceability, the high degree of anonymity, and the destruction of trust – that creates the structural impediments and powerful disincentive for improving the quality and safety of food.

Using a series of case-studies taken from the author’s practice as an attorney who represents the victims of foodborne illness, including outbreaks related to Salmonella in peanut butter and E. coli O157:H7 in bagged spinach, the author concludes the article by offering some thoughts on proposed core values that, if somehow made an essential or defining part of the market for food, would go far in making food in the United States, if not (cr)edible, at least much safer to eat.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 32

Keywords: Anonymity, Credibility, E. coli O157:H7, Food Safety Foodborne Illness, Free Market, Market Failure, Regulation, Salmonella, Traceability

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 19, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Stearns, Denis, On (Cr)edibility: Why Food in the United States May Never be Safe (2010). Stanford Law & Policy Review, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2010; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper No. 11-06. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1763422

Contact Information

Denis Stearns (Contact Author)
Seattle University School of Law ( email )
901 12th Avenue
Seattle, WA 98042
United States
206-398-4000 (Phone)
206-398-4077 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 856
Downloads: 108
Download Rank: 149,949

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.250 seconds