Moral Disgust or Religious Conviction: Opposition to Gay Rights in America

Rachel Stein

affiliation not provided to SSRN

Western Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting Paper

The language of contamination and pollution has long been used to ostracize members of out-groups, and the situation of gay and lesbian individuals in the United States today is no exception. Scholars have argued that this form of body politics is extremely powerful because it draws on feeling of disgust. Recent work in moral psychology has found that disgust is a moral sentiment. In other words, what people find disgusting, they are inclined to condemn. Research has also found that moral judgment of sexual behaviors in particular is driven by disgust. In contrast, the conventional wisdom holds that opposition to gay rights policies, such as gay marriage, gay adoption, and ending "don't ask, don't tell," is primarily driven by religious beliefs. In this paper, we provide the first rigorous empirical test of the hypothesis that feelings of disgust, as opposed to the conventional explanation, influence opposition to these policies. To do so, we present results from a nationally representative survey that includes measures of support for gay rights policies, relevant religious beliefs, and novel measures of disgust sensitivity that have been developed by moral psychologists. We also present results from a experiment comparing responses to questions that refer to 'gays and lesbians' versus questions that refer to 'homosexuals.' This analysis provides new insight into the body politics strategy of gay rights opponents, and why that strategy has often proved to be effective.

Not Available For Download

Date posted: February 22, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Stein, Rachel, Moral Disgust or Religious Conviction: Opposition to Gay Rights in America. Western Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting Paper . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1767127

Contact Information

Rachel Stein (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
No Address Available
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 334

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.140 seconds