Standardization and Markets: Just Exactly Who is the Government, and Why Should Antitrust Care?
Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, Cleveland State University
February 22, 2011
Oregon Law Review, Vol. 89, 2011
Cleveland-Marshall Legal Studies Paper No. 11-205
We take for granted that the basic choice in public policy is between allocation of resources by government bureaucracy, on the one hand, or allocation by markets, on the other. But that dichotomy is false, and at least under contemporary circumstances it is more accurate to describe the choice as between allocation by one kind of bureaucracy and allocation by a different kind of bureaucracy. This poses a problem for our antitrust policy, because it lacks any coherent guidance as to how to address those entities and transactions that are not governmental but are also not simply market-governed. This paper extensively examines one particular sector that nicely demonstrates how false the simple bureaucracy-markets dichotomy really is: the standard setting sector. Standardization is ubiquitous and hugely influential, but it is difficult to capture as either a government phenomenon or a market phenomenon.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 65
Keywords: Standards, Standardization, Standard Setting Organizations, Antitrust, Competition, Competition Policy, Public Private Distinction, Privatization
JEL Classification: B25, B52, D02, D2, D23, D4, D43, D59, D7, D71, D72, D73, D78, H1, H7, K2, K21, K23, L1, L14, L15, L2Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: February 22, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.485 seconds