Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1767508
 
 

Footnotes (44)



 


 



Chivalry is Not Dead: Murder, Gender, and the Death Penalty


Steven F. Shatz


University of San Francisco - School of Law

Naomi R. Shatz


Zalkind Duncan and Bernstein LLP

February 19, 2011

Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2011-08
Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
Chivalry - that set of values and code of conduct for the medieval knightly class - has long influenced American law, from Supreme Court decisions to substantive criminal law doctrines and the administration of criminal justice. The chivalrous knight was enjoined to seek honor and defend it through violence and, in a society which enforced strict gender roles, to show gallantry toward "ladies" of the same class, except for the women of the knight's own household, over whom he exercised complete authority. This article explores, for the first time, whether these chivalric values might explain sentencing outcomes in capital cases. The data for the article comes from our original study of 1299 first degree murder cases in California, whose death penalty scheme accords prosecutors and juries virtually unlimited discretion in making the death-selection decision. We examine sentencing outcomes for three particular types of murder where a "chivalry effect" might be expected - gang murders, rape murders and domestic violence murders. In cases involving single victims, the results were striking. In gang murders, the death sentence rate was less than one-tenth the overall death sentence rate. By contrast, in rape murder cases, the death sentence rate was nine times the overall death sentence rate. The death sentence rate for single-victim domestic violence murders was roughly 25% lower than the overall death sentence rate. We also examined, through this study and earlier California studies, more general data on gender disparities in death sentencing and found substantial gender-of-defendant and gender-of-victim disparities. Women guilty of capital murder are far less likely than men to be sentenced to death, and defendants who kill women are far more likely to be sentenced to death than defendants who kill men. We argue that all of these findings are consistent with chivalric norms, and we conclude that, in the prosecutors' decisions to seek death and juries' decisions to impose it, chivalry appears to be alive and well.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: chivalry, capital punishment, death penalty, gender disparity, gang murders, rape murders, domestic violence murders, sentencing, criminal procedure

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 23, 2011 ; Last revised: February 15, 2013

Suggested Citation

Shatz, Steven F. and Shatz, Naomi R., Chivalry is Not Dead: Murder, Gender, and the Death Penalty (February 19, 2011). Univ. of San Francisco Law Research Paper No. 2011-08; Berkeley Journal of Gender, Law & Justice, Vol. 27, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1767508

Contact Information

Steven F. Shatz (Contact Author)
University of San Francisco - School of Law ( email )
2130 Fulton Street
San Francisco, CA 94117
United States
Naomi R. Shatz
Zalkind Duncan and Bernstein LLP ( email )
65A Atlantic Avenue
Boston, MA 02110
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,845
Downloads: 1,018
Download Rank: 10,946
Footnotes:  44

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.609 seconds