Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1769130
 
 

Footnotes (161)



 


 



Predicting Fair Use


Matthew Sag


Loyola University Chicago School of Law

February 25, 2012

Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 73:1 47-91 (2012)
TRPC 2011
Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-005

Abstract:     
Fair use is often criticized as unpredictable and doctrinally incoherent - a conclusion which necessarily implies that the copyright system is fundamentally broken. This article confronts that critique by systematically assessing the predictability of fair use outcomes in litigation. Concentrating on characteristics of the contested use that would be apparent to litigants pre-trial, this study tests a number of doctrinal assumptions, claims and intuitions that have not, until now, been subject to empirical scrutiny.

This article presents new empirical evidence for the significance of transformative use in determining the outcomes of fair use cases. It also substantially undermines conceptions of the doctrine that are hostile to fair use claims by commercial entities and that would restrict limit the application of fair use as a subsidy or a redistributive tool favoring the politically and economically disadvantaged. Based on the available evidence, the fair use doctrine is more rational and consistent than is commonly assumed.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Keywords: Copyright, Fair Use, Empirical, Commercial, Creativity, Amount, Transformative Use, Laywers & Law Firms, Litigation

JEL Classification: K1, K41

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 27, 2011 ; Last revised: May 12, 2012

Suggested Citation

Sag, Matthew, Predicting Fair Use (February 25, 2012). Ohio State Law Journal, Vol. 73:1 47-91 (2012); TRPC 2011; Loyola University Chicago School of Law Research Paper No. 2012-005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1769130 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1769130

Contact Information

Matthew Sag (Contact Author)
Loyola University Chicago School of Law ( email )
25 E. Pearson
Chicago, IL 60611
United States

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 5,135
Downloads: 614
Download Rank: 23,084
Footnotes:  161

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.297 seconds