Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1769270
 
 

Footnotes (265)



 
 

Comments (1)

Last comment: April 27, 2011

 


 



Rescuing the Invention from the Cult of the Claim


Oskar Liivak


Cornell Law School

February 24, 2012

Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
Patent law is certainly a specialized field but I didn’t think it would be a cult. The term ‘invention’ appears in many critical statutory locations. Yet we have been taught, perhaps brainwashed, to give the term zero substantive import. Substantive use of the invention has been purged from patent doctrine. Instead every substantive question in patent law is answered by reference to the claims, the legal descriptions of the ‘metes and bounds’ of a patent’s exclusionary reach. Despite its promise of precision and uniformity, our modern invention-less system is anything but precise and uniform. This article argues that the trouble stems from this trivial vision of the invention. It leads to meaningless claim interpretation, to an incomplete a vision of the disclosure requirements, and to a system that regularly violates one of patent law’s few constitutional limitations. Correctly viewed, invention is a substantive concept. The invention is simply the inventor’s own solution to some technical problem. In patent jargon, the invention is the set of embodiments conceived and disclosed by the inventor in enough detail such that they are capable of being reduced to practice. The purpose of the patent system is to secure exclusive rights in that invention if it is patentable. Claims still matter but only as tools that aid in administering that system. The patent system that embodies this substantive vision of the invention is not only the system I think Congress intended but it is also a more precise and stable system than the one we are using today.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: patent law, invention, claims, conception, claim construction, claim interpretation, disclosure, written description

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: February 24, 2011 ; Last revised: April 27, 2012

Suggested Citation

Liivak, Oskar, Rescuing the Invention from the Cult of the Claim (February 24, 2012). Seton Hall Law Review, Vol. 42, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1769270 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1769270

Contact Information

Oskar Liivak (Contact Author)
Cornell Law School ( email )
Ithaca, NY 14853
United States
607-255-1715 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,948
Downloads: 379
Download Rank: 43,035
Footnotes:  265

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.297 seconds