|
|
|
|
||||
|
||||
William H. Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont, et al. v. IMS Health Inc., et al. - Amicus Brief in Support of PetitionersKevin OuttersonBoston University School of Law David OrentlicherIndiana University - Robert H. McKinney School of Law Christopher T. RobertsonUniversity of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law; Harvard University - Edmond J. Safra Center for Ethics Frank A. Pasquale IIISeton Hall University - School of Law; Yale University - Yale Information Society Project February 26, 2011 Abstract: On April 26, 2011, the US Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the Vermont data mining case, Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc. Respondents claim this is the most important commercial speech case in a decade. Petitioner (the State of Vermont) argues this is the most important medical privacy case since Whalen v. Roe. The is an amicus brief supporting Vermont, written by law professors and submitted on behalf of the New England Journal of Medicine
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55 Keywords: first amendment, commercial speech, privacy, confidentiality, data mining, HIPAA working papers seriesDate posted: March 1, 2011 ; Last revised: February 18, 2012Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.469 seconds
