Does Gender Matter for Academic Promotion? Evidence from a Randomized Natural Experiment
Spanish Council for Scientific Research (CSIC) - Institute of Public Goods and Policies (IPP)
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid
IZA Discussion Paper No. 5537
Several countries have recently introduced gender quotas in hiring and promotion committees at universities. This paper studies whether these policies increase the presence of women in top academic positions. The identification strategy exploits the random assignment mechanism in place between 2002 and 2006 in all academic disciplines in Spain to select the members of promotion committees. We find that a larger proportion of female evaluators increases the chances of success of female applicants to full professor positions. The magnitude of the effect is large: each additional woman on a committee composed of seven members increases the number of women promoted to full professor by 14%. Conversely, when committee members decide on promotions to associate professor positions, we do not observe any significant interaction between the gender of evaluators and the gender of candidates. If anything, in this case a larger share of female evaluators is associated with fewer successful female applicants. The evidence is consistent with the existence of ambivalent sexism.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 45
Keywords: academic promotion, gender discrimination, randomized natural experiment
JEL Classification: J71, J45working papers series
Date posted: March 1, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo4 in 1.594 seconds