|
||||
|
||||
The Overused and Under-Defined Notion of 'Material' in Securities LawDale A. OesterleOhio State University (OSU) - Michael E. Moritz College of Law February 28, 2011 Ohio State Public Law Working Paper No. 145 Abstract: Core doctrine in federal securities law rests on a single word - "material." Federal statutes and agency anti-fraud rules and disclosure requirements contain the term as an essential qualifier and identifier. "Facts" or "information" must be "material" before a legal obligation to disclose attaches. In other words, the term material has an unrivaled position in the center of all of securities law and agency rules and court decisions applying the term necessarily establish the fundamental scope and bite of securities regulation. A study of close to eight hundred cases in which a federal court’s applies the term to specific facts, however, finds that the case-law is, well, quixotic at best and fickle at worst. An argument on the proper breakdown of the cases is begun here.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 33 working papers seriesDate posted: March 2, 2011 ; Last revised: June 28, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.454 seconds