|
||||
|
||||
Sexual Orientation Wage Gap: The Role of Occupational Sorting and Human CapitalHeather AntecolClaremont Colleges - Robert Day School of Economics and Finance; Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Anneke Jongaffiliation not provided to SSRN Michael D. SteinbergerPomona College - Department of Economics July 1, 2008 Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol. 61, No. 4, 2008 Abstract: Using data from the 2000 U.S. Census, the authors explore two alternative explanations for the sexual orientation wage gap: occupational sorting, and human capital differences. They find that lesbian women earned more than heterosexual women irrespective of marital status, while gay men earned less than their married heterosexual counterparts but more than their cohabitating heterosexual counterparts. Results of a Oaxaca-Blinder decomposition indicate that the relative wage advantages observed for some groups of lesbians and gay men were mainly owing to greater levels of human capital accumulation (particularly education), while occupational sorting had little or no influence. The relative wage penalties that were observed in other cases, however, cannot be attributed either to differences in occupational sorting or to human capital. An analysis employing a DiNardo, Fortin, and Lemieux decomposition, which allows for variation in the wage gap at different points along the wage distribution, broadly confirms these results.
Keywords: Sexual Orientation Wage Gap JEL Classification: J15, J31 Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 2, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.406 seconds