Abstract

 
 

References (66)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Litigation: The Role of Nonaudit Services Fees


Jaime J. Schmidt


University of Texas at Austin

December 30, 2011

Forthcoming in The Accounting Review

Abstract:     
This study investigates whether audit litigants act as if they believe jurors will associate auditor-provided nonaudit services (NAS) with impaired auditor independence, and thus substandard auditor performance. Using GAAP-based financial statement restatements disclosed from 2001 – 2007 as an indicator for audit failure, I find that the amount of nonaudit (NAS) fees and the ratio of NAS fees to total fees is positively associated with the likelihood that a restatement results in audit litigation. I also find that when plaintiff attorneys argue that auditor independence was impaired due to dependence on client fees and, in particular, NAS fees, restatement-related audit litigation is more likely to result in an auditor settlement and a larger amount of settlement. These results suggest that audit litigants act as if they believe NAS fees will strengthen the case against the auditor, and thus affect the court resolution if the lawsuit is taken to verdict.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: auditor independence, nonaudit services fees, audit litigation, auditor settlements, financial statement restatements

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 2, 2011 ; Last revised: January 3, 2012

Suggested Citation

Schmidt, Jaime J., Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Litigation: The Role of Nonaudit Services Fees (December 30, 2011). Forthcoming in The Accounting Review. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1773799 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1773799

Contact Information

Jaime J. Schmidt (Contact Author)
University of Texas at Austin ( email )
Austin, TX 78712
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,025
Downloads: 338
Download Rank: 41,900
References:  66
Citations:  1

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.438 seconds