|
Based on your IP address, your paper is being delivered by:
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
New York, USA
Processing request.
|
Illinois, USA
Processing request.
|
Brussels, Belgium
Processing request.
|
Seoul, Korea
Processing request.
|
California, USA
Processing request.
|
If you have any problems downloading this paper, please click on another Download Location above, or
File name: SSRN-id1978473. ; Size: 1021K
|
|
Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Litigation: The Role of Nonaudit Services Fees
Jaime J. Schmidt University of Texas at Austin
December 30, 2011
Forthcoming in The Accounting Review
Abstract:
This study investigates whether audit litigants act as if they believe jurors will associate auditor-provided nonaudit services (NAS) with impaired auditor independence, and thus substandard auditor performance. Using GAAP-based financial statement restatements disclosed from 2001 – 2007 as an indicator for audit failure, I find that the amount of nonaudit (NAS) fees and the ratio of NAS fees to total fees is positively associated with the likelihood that a restatement results in audit litigation. I also find that when plaintiff attorneys argue that auditor independence was impaired due to dependence on client fees and, in particular, NAS fees, restatement-related audit litigation is more likely to result in an auditor settlement and a larger amount of settlement. These results suggest that audit litigants act as if they believe NAS fees will strengthen the case against the auditor, and thus affect the court resolution if the lawsuit is taken to verdict.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54
Keywords: auditor independence, nonaudit services fees, audit litigation, auditor settlements, financial statement restatements
Accepted Paper Series
Download This Paper
Date posted: March 2, 2011
; Last revised: January 3, 2012
Suggested CitationSchmidt, Jaime J., Perceived Auditor Independence and Audit Litigation: The Role of Nonaudit Services Fees (December 30, 2011). Forthcoming in The Accounting Review. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1773799 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1773799
|
| Feedback to SSRN (Beta) |
|
|
People who downloaded this paper also downloaded:
1.
Ability of Accounting and Audit Quality Variables to Predict Bank Failure During the Financial Crisis
By
Justin Jin,
Kiridaran (giri) Kanagaretnam, ...
2.
Bringing Darkness to Light: The Influence of Auditor Quality and Audit Committee Expertise on the Timeliness of Financial Statement Restatement Disclosures
By
Jaime Schmidt
and
Michael Wilkins
3.
Audit Partner Busyness and Audit Quality
By
John Goodwin
4.
Audit Partner Disclosure: Potential Implications for Investor Reaction and Auditor Independence
By
Tamara Lambert,
Benjamin Luippold, ...
5.
Capital-Market Effects of Securities Regulation: Hysteresis, Implementation, and Enforcement
By
Hans Christensen,
Luzi Hail, ...
6.
Mandatory IFRS Adoption and Financial Statement Comparability
By
Francois Brochet,
Alan Jagolinzer, ...
7.
Audit Fee Stickiness
By
Charl De Villiers,
David Hay, ...
8.
Audit Quality and Auditor Reputation: Evidence from Japan
By
Douglas Skinner
and
Suraj Srinivasan
9.
Auditor Fees and Auditor Independence: Evidence from Going Concern Reporting Decisions
By
Marshall Geiger
and
Allen Blay
10.
Does Audit Market Concentration Harm the Quality of Audited Earnings? Evidence from Audit Markets in 42 Countries
By
Jere Francis,
Paul Michas, ...
|
|
|
|