Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1774102
 
 

Footnotes (43)



 


 



Unmasking Anonymous Defendants in Internet Defamation Cases: Recent Developments and Unresolved Issues


Matthew Nied


affiliation not provided to SSRN

February 2011

Canadian Privacy Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 31, 2011

Abstract:     
While the internet provides users with an environment in which socially valuable speech can flourish, it also provides users with an opportunity to defame others behind a shield of anonymity. If these users can be identified, they may be held liable for defamation. Unfortunately for plaintiffs, the identities of these users are usually known only by the website or internet service provider ("ISP") through which the statements were made, and these third parties generally decline to disclose a user's identity in the absence of a court order compelling them to do so. Faced with a growing stream of applications for such orders, courts have sought to consistently assess them in a way that strikes an appropriate balance between the freedom of expression and privacy interests of anonymous defendants and the reputational interests of plaintiffs.

Currently, there are two ways for plaintiffs to compel third parties to disclose the identity of anonymous defendants: by seeking an equitable remedy of discovery known as a "Norwich order", or by seeking pre-action discovery or production under the applicable rules of civil procedure. Although courts have developed these approaches to strike a more appropriate balance between the competing interests, two unresolved issues remain to threaten that balance. First, while the approaches are similar, they differ with respect to the protection that they afford to the privacy and freedom of expression interests of anonymous defendants. Second, neither approach requires that anonymous defendants be informed of applications for the disclosure of their identities in order to enable them to represent their interests. This article surveys the two approaches, discusses the unresolved issues, and considers how courts may address them.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 7

Keywords: internet, defamation, anonymity, disclosure, privacy, freedom of expression

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 3, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Nied, Matthew, Unmasking Anonymous Defendants in Internet Defamation Cases: Recent Developments and Unresolved Issues (February 2011). Canadian Privacy Law Review, Vol. 8, No. 3, p. 31, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1774102

Contact Information

Matthew Nied (Contact Author)
affiliation not provided to SSRN ( email )
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 607
Downloads: 133
Download Rank: 125,633
Footnotes:  43

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.235 seconds