Strength of the International Trade Commission as a Patent Venue
Christopher Anthony Cotropia
University of Richmond School of Law
March 2, 2011
Texas Intellectual Prfoperty Law Journal, Vol. 19, 2011
The United States International Trade Commission ("ITC") is a relatively new player in patent enforcement. The ITC, an administrative agency, can exclude the importation of infringing products into the United States, and interest from patentees in obtaining such remedies has grown as of late. Yet, many practitioners and scholars postulate that the Federal Circuit's recent decision Kyocera Wireless Corp. v. International Trade Commission, which dramatically narrowed the scope of available ITC remedies, will significantly alter ITC practice and cause a decline in ITC filings.
This Article, by collecting data on ITC filings and parallel district court filings before and after Kyocera, makes a surprising finding. Conventional wisdom is wrong - patentees have not reacted to Kyocera in any of the ways predicted. The make-up of ITC cases has not changed, and the number of ITC filings continues to rise at a rapid pace. These findings do more than simply answer open questions regarding Kyocera - they speak volumes on the favorability of the ITC as a venue and its permanency in the patent enforcement landscape.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 32
Keywords: Patent, International Trade Commission, KyoceraAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 4, 2011 ; Last revised: May 25, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 3.953 seconds