Abstract

 


 



Controversial Conceptions: The Unborn and the American Convention on Human Rights


Álvaro Paúl


University of Dublin - Trinity College

March 4, 2011

Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 209-247, 2012

Abstract:     
This study interprets the ambiguous Article 4(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights, which establishes that life shall be protected “in general, from the moment of conception.” When doing so, it pays attention to different interpretive systems, and takes into account what is recorded in the travaux préparatoires of the Convention. Likewise, this study analyzes what the Inter-American Commission has determined on this issue, and assesses the value of these decisions. This article concludes that, even though one of the possible interpretations of the American Convention affirms that it would tolerate domestic legislations providing for abortion in exceptional circumstances, it declares the unborn’s personhood.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 39

Keywords: American Convention, Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Life, Unborn, Abortion

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 5, 2011 ; Last revised: August 2, 2012

Suggested Citation

Paúl, Álvaro, Controversial Conceptions: The Unborn and the American Convention on Human Rights (March 4, 2011). Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, Vol. 9, Issue 2, pp. 209-247, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1776922 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1776922

Contact Information

Álvaro Paúl (Contact Author)
University of Dublin - Trinity College ( email )
Law Faculty
Dublin 2, Leinster 2
Ireland
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,126
Downloads: 237
Download Rank: 62,668

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.875 seconds