Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1777524
 


 



A Review of Law Reviews: Comments of a Contented Victim


Jean Leclair


Université de Montréal - Faculty of Law

December 4, 2005

Queen's Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 385-401, 2005

Abstract:     
The author describes the differences in origin and management between American and English Canadian law reviews (including the McGill Law Journal) and Quebec French-speaking Faculty periodicals, which he refers to as “revues juridiques.” Whereas American law reviews are entirely managed by students, student involvement in the editorial decisions of the revues juridiques is minimal. Faculty members have the last word on all the important questions. English Canadian law reviews fall somewhere in between their American counterparts and Quebec’s revues juridiques. As the author demonstrates, the difference in legal tradition (civil law vs. common law) goes a long way in explaining why student-edited law reviews do not exist in Quebec. The author concludes by commenting upon his own personal experience with law reviews.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 17

Keywords: Law Reviews, Canada, USA, Quebec, Civil Law, Common Law, History, Legal Periodicals, Roman Law, Civil Code

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 7, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Leclair, Jean, A Review of Law Reviews: Comments of a Contented Victim (December 4, 2005). Queen's Law Journal, Vol. 31, pp. 385-401, 2005. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1777524

Contact Information

Jean Leclair (Contact Author)
Université de Montréal - Faculty of Law ( email )
Montreal, Quebec H3C 3J7
Canada
514.343.7487 (Phone)
514.343.2199 (Fax)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 210
Downloads: 11

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.328 seconds