|
||||
|
||||
Using Insurance Law and Policy to Interpret the Tax Code’s Loss and Medical Expense ProvisionsAndrew Blair-StanekUniversity of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law 2007 Yale Law & Policy Review, Vol. 26, p. 309, 2007 Abstract: Prior scholarship recognized that I.R.C. § 165 (allowing a deduction for casualty losses) and I.R.C. § 165 (authorizing a deduction for medical expenses) are a free partial insurance scheme, providing tax benefits that partially offset the losses or medical expenses. Courts have long wrestled with determining eligibility for these deductions. This Note proposes that courts should look to the well-developed body of insurance case law to interpret eligibility for these deductions. It further proposed that the government, which effectively acts as an insurer via these deductions, could raise additional revenue using subrogation, which traditional insurers have long used to partially recoup payouts.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36 Keywords: tax, taxation, insurance, deductions, casualty loss, medical expense Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 6, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.422 seconds