Convincing Elites, Controlling Elites
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) - School of Law
March 1, 2011
Studies in Law, Politics, and Society, Vol. 54, pp. 175-211, 2011
Loyola-LA Legal Studies Paper No. 2011-09
Within the legal mobilization framework, sociolegal scholars identify elite support as a key indirect benefit of litigation. Court-centered strategies generate support from influential state and private actors, and this support helps a movement to achieve its goals. Instead of assuming elite support to be a decidedly positive step in a movement’s trajectory, a more contextual analysis situates elite support as a complex, dynamic factor that movement advocates attempt to manage. Such support may at times create political and legal risks that jeopardize a movement’s progress. My analysis of the marriage equality movement suggests a tentative typology with which to approach elite support: Elite support appears generally productive for a movement when it leads to action consistent with the movement’s strategy. On the other hand, elite support may pose significant risk when it prompts action inconsistent with the movement’s strategic plan, even if it is consistent with the movement’s substantive positions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 38
Keywords: Legal Mobilization, Same-Sex Marriage, Marriage Equality, Social Movements, Elite Support, Cause Lawyering
Date posted: March 6, 2011 ; Last revised: March 9, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.204 seconds