Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1780235
 


 



That's Not Discrimination: American Beliefs and the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Law


Katie R. Eyer


Rutgers School of Law -- Camden

March 7, 2011

96 Minnesota Law Review 1275

Abstract:     
Empirical studies have shown that discrimination litigants face difficult odds. Indeed, less than 5% of all discrimination plaintiffs achieve any form of litigated relief. These odds are far worse than those faced by virtually any other category of federal litigants and extend to every conceivable procedural juncture, from motions to dismiss, to post-verdict appeals. So what explains these results?

Surprisingly, there have been few robust attempts to answer this core question. Thus, while we have extensive data demonstrating that discrimination litigants fare poorly in the courts, we know little about why. This Article – drawing on a heretofore unexplored area of the psychological literature (regarding how and why people make attributions to discrimination) – attempts to fill this gap by developing a theoretical framework for understanding the difficulties that discrimination litigants face.

What this framework (and the underlying psychological literature) suggests is that the difficulties that discrimination litigants face are likely to be deeply intractable. Indeed, it appears that the difficulties that discrimination litigants face are founded in fundamental American background beliefs regarding meritocracy and discrimination; beliefs that are widely shared and generally impervious to change.

These findings have profound implications for contemporary recommendations for anti-discrimination reform. Most notably, they suggest a need to look for alternatives that will be less susceptible to the negative effects of American background beliefs, including alternatives that may be outside the scope of traditional anti-discrimination law (for example, just cause claims or FMLA-style laws). This Article thus concludes by providing a preliminary discussion of the potential benefits and drawbacks of such “extra-discrimination remedies.”

Number of Pages in PDF File: 88

Keywords: Discrimination, Psychology, Remedies, Employment Law

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2011 ; Last revised: August 22, 2012

Suggested Citation

Eyer, Katie R., That's Not Discrimination: American Beliefs and the Limits of Anti-Discrimination Law (March 7, 2011). 96 Minnesota Law Review 1275. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1780235

Contact Information

Katie R. Eyer (Contact Author)
Rutgers School of Law -- Camden ( email )
217 N. 5th Street
Camden, NJ 08102-1203
United States
856-225-6960 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,674
Downloads: 370
Download Rank: 42,542

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.407 seconds