Optional Law: A Plea for Multiple Choice in Private Law
Jan M. Smits
Maastricht University Faculty of Law - Maastricht European Private Law Institute (M-EPLI); University of Helsinki - Center of Excellence in Foundations of European Law and Polity
March 16, 2011
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, Vol. 17, pp. 347-352, 2010
The recent publication of the Green Paper on European contract law by the European Commission (2010) breathes new life into the old plan to develop an optional contract law for the European Union, based on the Draft Common Frame of Reference of European Private Law (DCFR). This editorial praises this initiative. It is also a plea for the introduction of optional law in many more areas than contract law alone. In the prevailing view, the conduct of private actors (such as citizens and firms) is governed by only one law. A view of optional law defends that these actors should be left with a multiple choice among various jurisdictions. This view is elaborated by giving an overview of existing European optional regimes (including the European Company, EEIG, SCE, Community trademark, European enforcement order, European payment order and European small claims procedure) and by asking what advantages optional law can have at both the European and the national level.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 6
Keywords: Optional contract code, European company (SE), Mandatory law, Legal tourism, DCFRAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 9, 2011 ; Last revised: April 14, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.313 seconds