Empirical Regularity in Academic Research Productivity Patterns in Marketing
State University of New York at Buffalo - School of Management
Vijay Ganesh Hariharan
Erasmus University Rotterdam (EUR) - Department of Business Economics
University of North Carolina (UNC) at Chapel Hill - Marketing Area
March 23, 2011
International Journal of Research in Marketing, 2011
In any academic discipline, published articles in respective journals represent “production units” of scientific knowledge, and bibliometric distributions reflect the patterns in such productivity across authors or "producers." We use a comprehensive data set from 11 leading marketing journals to examine if there is any empirical regularity in the patterns of research productivity in the marketing literature. Our results present strong evidence that there is indeed a distinct empirical regularity. It is the so called generalized Lotka’s Law of scientific productivity pattern: the number of authors publishing n papers is about 1/n^c of those publishing one paper. We find the empirically estimated value of the exponent c to be 2.05 for the overall bibliometric data across the leading marketing journals. For the individual journals, the estimated values of c range from 2.15 to 2.83, with lower values indicating higher authorship concentration levels. We also find that variations in authorship concentration levels across journals and over time are driven by a journal’s maturity, topical focus, attractiveness as a publication outlet, review process characteristics, and the extent of author collaboration present. We discuss the general implications of our findings.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 30
Keywords: Scientific Productivity, Bibliometric Distributions, Lotka’s Law, Empirical Regularity, Cumulative Advantage, Author ConcentrationAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 7, 2011 ; Last revised: March 25, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.484 seconds