The Fight Over 'Fighting Regs' and Judicial Deference in Tax Litigation

Leandra Lederman

Indiana University Maurer School of Law


Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92, 2012
Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 186

The question of how much deference courts should accord agency interpretations of statutes is a high-profile and important issue that affects both rulemaking and case outcomes. What level of deference should courts accord an agency regulation or other rule that an agency has issued opportunistically, during the course of related litigation? This important question has arisen in numerous cases, including the 2011 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research v. United States, a case involving a Treasury regulation.

To answer the question, the Article analyzes the law on judicial deference to tax authorities generally, as well as specific to the context of pending litigation. It concludes that deference under the famous case of Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. applies to all Treasury regulations issued in accordance with the requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act. It further argues that Revenue Rulings - formal guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service - should receive deference under Skidmore v. Swift & Co. Following an analysis of the literature and applicable case law, the Article proposes that rulings issued during the controversy receive the applicable level of deference (Chevron or Skidmore), but that the deference inquiry take into account the retroactivity and surprise issues raised by the timing of the agency’s guidance.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 59

Keywords: Chevron deference, Skidmore, Mayo Foundation, Brand X, Treasury regulation, Revenue Ruling, fighting regulation, pending litigation, Internal Revenue Service

JEL Classification: K23, K34, K41

Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2011 ; Last revised: July 11, 2013

Suggested Citation

Lederman, Leandra, The Fight Over 'Fighting Regs' and Judicial Deference in Tax Litigation (2012). Boston University Law Review, Vol. 92, 2012; Indiana Legal Studies Research Paper No. 186. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1780513

Contact Information

Leandra Lederman (Contact Author)
Indiana University Maurer School of Law ( email )
211 S. Indiana Avenue
Bloomington, IN 47405
United States
(812) 855-6149 (Phone)
(812) 855-0555 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.law.indiana.edu/people/lederman
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,433
Downloads: 236
Download Rank: 92,664

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.281 seconds