Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1780554
 
 

References (17)



 
 

Citations (1)



 


 



An Assessment of Proposed Changes to the Child Support Formula


K. Stuart Birks


Massey University - College of Business

February 28, 2011

Policy Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 31-38, February 2011

Abstract:     
The current New Zealand child support formula has been in place for nearly twenty years. Despite recognised problems and ongoing dissatisfaction, only minor changes have been made in that time. The current Government has opened consultation on proposed changes which address some of the major issues, in particular the assessment of costs of children, consideration of the income of both payer and payee, and allocation when care is shared. IRD analysis replicates an Australian approach to derive a proposed alternative formula. This paper assesses the analysis. It finds that results are highly sensitive to the assumptions, that the formulation is based on questionable concepts, and that there are hidden assumptions which may be a cause of current dissatisfaction and harmful to children. A simplified alternative is suggested which recognises the limitations in analysis and implementation and may be more acceptable.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 8

Keywords: Child Support, New Zealand

JEL Classification: C53, D19, D63, D78, K00

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 8, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Birks, K. Stuart, An Assessment of Proposed Changes to the Child Support Formula (February 28, 2011). Policy Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 31-38, February 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1780554

Contact Information

K. Stuart Birks (Contact Author)
Massey University - College of Business ( email )
New Zealand
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 510
Downloads: 95
Download Rank: 162,445
References:  17
Citations:  1

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.250 seconds