Implications of European Disintegration for International Law
Matthew C. Turk
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
March 1, 2011
Columbia Journal of European Law, Vol. 17, p. 395, 2011
The European debt crisis that started in 2009 has revealed underlying structural problems in the European Monetary Union, threatening the viability of the common currency in its current form. An unraveling of monetary coordination in Europe would mark a significant event of disintegration, in the face of a decades-long trend of integration that was commonly considered an inevitable and self-sustaining process.
This Article argues that even a reasonable possibility of disintegration of this magnitude upsets previous theorizing about European integration which over-emphasized the EU’s “supranational” character.
More generally, disintegration poses serious problems for international law scholarship across the ideological spectrum, much of which has organized itself around the historically contingent trend of integration as if it were an a-historical given. The debt crises reveals that use of Europe by both “Skeptical” and “Cosmopolitan” international law scholars is largely an opportunistic rhetorical strategy that conceals fundamental weaknesses of both viewpoints in their debate over the limits and promise of international legalization and cooperation.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 52
Keywords: EU, Greece, Debt Crisis, International Law, Law and Economics, European Integration, Theories of International LawAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: April 25, 2011 ; Last revised: July 26, 2012
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.250 seconds