Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781485
 
 

Footnotes (226)



 


 



Violent Video Games & ‘Constitutionalized’ Negligence


Deana Pollard-Sacks


Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law

March 8, 2011

Washington University Law Review, 2012

Abstract:     
Violent video games create serious risks of harm to children’s brain functioning, health, and safety. Extremely wealthy game producers’ demonstrated disregard for children’s safety raises questions about lower courts’ negligent speech liability rules that effectively bar tort liability for unreasonably dangerous speech, including violent video games. Violent Video Games & “Constitutionalized” Negligence reviews the latest scientific data on the effects of violent video games on children and challenges the prevailing negligent speech liability rules generally, and specifically relative to violent video game producers’ relationship with children. Most courts have adopted the Brandenburg incitement test to prove fault and causation in violent media and other dangerous speech cases, but the incitement test cannot properly address issues of fault and causation in such cases. The incitement test should be replaced by a “constitutionalized” negligence paradigm, consistent with the Supreme Court’s method of “constitutionalizing” tort liability for speech by raising the prima facie evidentiary requirements of tort claims to reconcile them with the First Amendment. Violent Video Games & “Constitutionalized” Negligence proposes a constitutionalized negligence paradigm for analyzing tort liability for clearly unreasonably dangerous speech that in fact causes serious injury or death, and contextualizes the test relative to the facts concerning the violent video game industry and children.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 51

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 9, 2011 ; Last revised: February 9, 2013

Suggested Citation

Pollard-Sacks, Deana, Violent Video Games & ‘Constitutionalized’ Negligence (March 8, 2011). Washington University Law Review, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781485

Contact Information

Deana Pollard-Sacks (Contact Author)
Texas Southern University - Thurgood Marshall School of Law ( email )
3100 Cleburne Street
Houston, TX 77004
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 702
Downloads: 106
Download Rank: 152,973
Footnotes:  226
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.360 seconds