Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781579
 


 



Personal Religious Beliefs in the Workplace: How Not to Define Indirect Discrimination


Nicholas Hatzis


University of Oxford - Faculty of Law; City Law School

March 4, 2011

The Modern Law Review, Vol. 74, Issue 2, pp. 287-305, 2011

Abstract:     
In cases concerning indirect religious discrimination the claimant must demonstrate that an otherwise neutral measure has caused her to suffer a particular disadvantage because of her religion. In Eweida v British Airways the Court of Appeal held that personal religious beliefs which are not part of official religious dogma cannot be relied upon as the basis for a claim of indirect discrimination. I discuss, first, the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in Eweida; then I examine the way personal religious beliefs have been treated in other cases in Britain and in the United States; finally, I place the issue in a wider human rights framework.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 19

Accepted Paper Series


Date posted: July 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Hatzis, Nicholas, Personal Religious Beliefs in the Workplace: How Not to Define Indirect Discrimination (March 4, 2011). The Modern Law Review, Vol. 74, Issue 2, pp. 287-305, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1781579 or http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2230.2011.00847.x

Contact Information

Nicholas Hatzis (Contact Author)
University of Oxford - Faculty of Law ( email )
Lady Margaret Hall
Oxford, Oxfordshire OX2 6QA
United Kingdom
City Law School ( email )
Northampton Square
London, EC1V OHB
United Kingdom
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 507
Downloads: 2

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.422 seconds