|
||||
|
||||
Sorting and the Output Loss Due to Search FrictionsPieter A. GautierFree University of Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam (TIA); Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA) Coen TeulingsCPB Netherlands Bureau of Economic Policy Analysis; Tinbergen Institute February 1, 2011 CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP8257 Abstract: We analyze a general search model with on-the-job search and sorting of heterogeneous workers into heterogeneous jobs. This model yields a simple relationship between (i) the unemployment rate, (ii) the value of non-market time, and (iii) the max-mean wage differential. The latter measure of wage dispersion is more robust than measures based on the reservation wage, due to the long left tail of the wage distribution. We estimate this wage differential using data on match quality and allow for measurement error. The estimated wage dispersion and mismatch for the US is consistent with an unemployment rate of 4-6%. We find that without search frictions, output would be between 7.5% and 18.5% higher, depending on whether or not firms can ex ante commit to wage payments.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 54 Keywords: mismatch, on-the-job search, sorting, unemployment JEL Classification: E24, J62, J63, J64 working papers seriesDate posted: March 14, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo7 in 1.876 seconds