Freedom of Reincorporation and the Scope of Corporate Law in the U.S. and the E.U.
Federico M. Mucciarelli
University of London, SOAS, Department of Financial and Management Studies; University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - School of Economics
March 11, 2011
NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-07
In the U.S. corporations can be incorporated in any of the 50 states and can "reincorporate" afterwards in any other state. In the E.U. such freedoms are a recent achievement: In the last decade, first the European Court of Justice has liberalized initial incorporations and only in 2005 the cross-border directive has open the doors to freedom of midstream reincorporation from one member state to another. Midstream reincorporations, however, in the E.U. have a much different impact than on the other side of the Atlantic. In the U.S., indeed, the competence of the state where a company is incorporated is limited: On the one hand, it is restricted by federal laws and, on the other hand, it regulates only the “internal affairs” of corporate activities. By contrast, in the European Union, the agency problems between shareholders and board are bundled with the agency problems between shareholders and creditors, all being part of "corporate law" and in the exclusive competence of the member state of incorporation. Consequently, in the U.S. reincorporations are a relatively easy task, since they shift only rules that address the shareholders-board relation, while creditors and other stakeholders are not affected. By contrast, in the E.U., any change of the applicable corporate law risks to jeopardize also creditors. Adjusting creditors will discount this risk from the credit rate or will protect themselves through specific covenant, but not sophisticated creditors will bear entirely the risk of opportunistic reincorporations. For this reason, many E.U. member states provide mechanisms for creditors’ protection in case of reincorporation, often by requiring the debtor to give a security or to pay the debts that are not yet due. These mechanisms are necessary to avoid negative externalities in "multi-stakeholder" corporate laws, yet they make reincorporations more expensive and will impede a certain number of efficient transactions.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 65
Date posted: March 21, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 0.328 seconds