Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1784622
 
 

Footnotes (195)



 


 



'Minute and Separate': Considering the Admissibility of Videotaped Forensic Interviews in Child Sexual Abuse Cases after Crawford and Davis


Kimberly Y. Chin


Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP

2010

Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2010

Abstract:     
Child sexual abuse is one of the least prosecuted crimes in the United States in part because of the many evidentiary challenges prosecutors face. In 2004, the Supreme Court introduced a new standard for determining the admissibility of out-of-court statements made by declarants who are unavailable to testify at trial. In Crawford v. Washington, the Supreme Court held that testimonial statements are only admissible at trial if the declarant is unavailable to testify and there was a prior opportunity for cross-examination. This Note will examine Crawford’s impact on the admissibility of videotaped forensic interviews with child victims of sexual abuse and suggest that courts adopt a “minute and separate” approach when deciding whether statements contained in those interviews are testimonial in nature.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 36

Keywords: Confrontation Clause, Sixth Amendment, Crawford, Davis, Melendez-Diaz, primary purpose test, testimonial, child abuse, sexual abuse, videotape, forensic interview, evidence, hearsay


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 18, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Chin, Kimberly Y., 'Minute and Separate': Considering the Admissibility of Videotaped Forensic Interviews in Child Sexual Abuse Cases after Crawford and Davis (2010). Boston College Third World Law Journal, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1784622

Contact Information

Kimberly Y. Chin (Contact Author)
Allen, Glaessner, Hazelwood & Werth LLP ( email )
180 Montgomery Street
Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94104
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 450
Downloads: 77
Download Rank: 209,101
Footnotes:  195

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 1.188 seconds