Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1785618
 


 



Judges Who Settle


Hillary A. Sale


Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law

March 1, 2011

Washington University Law Review, Forthcoming
Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-03-02

Abstract:     
This Article develops a construct of judges as gatekeepers in corporate and securities litigation, focusing on the last-period, or settlement stage of the cases. Many accounts of corporate scandals have focused on gatekeepers and the roles they played or, in some cases, abdicated. Corporate gatekeepers, like investment bankers, accountants, and lawyers, function as enablers and monitors. They facilitate transactions and enable corporate actors to access the financial and securities markets. Without them the transactions would not happen. In class actions and derivative litigation, judges are the monitors and enablers. They are required to oversee the litigation arising from bad transactions and corporate scandals. Unlike other types of private law litigation, where the parties settle and have the case dismissed, judges must approve settlements of class actions and derivative litigation. They are actually charged with fiduciary responsibilities and control the exit stage, or settlement, of the litigation. As a result, the judges’ job is to be a gatekeeper.

The judges are not, however, doing their jobs. “Doing their jobs” requires actual scrutiny of the role of defense counsel and insurers, both of whom amplify agency costs. It also requires scrutiny of the settlement collusion between defendants and plaintiffs. Yet, traditionally both academics and the courts have failed to analyze those issues in the context of the costs of aggregate and derivative litigation. This Article provides a real cut at those issues. It then develops and explores principles for gate keeping judges, which, if implemented, will decrease the agency costs of this type of litigation and ensure that the judges are actually functioning as the fiduciaries they are required to be.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 49

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 17, 2011 ; Last revised: October 24, 2011

Suggested Citation

Sale, Hillary A., Judges Who Settle (March 1, 2011). Washington University Law Review, Forthcoming; Washington University in St. Louis Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-03-02. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1785618

Contact Information

Hillary A. Sale (Contact Author)
Washington University in Saint Louis - School of Law ( email )
Campus Box 1120
St. Louis, MO 63130
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 768
Downloads: 101
Download Rank: 154,268

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.812 seconds