Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1785894
 


 



The Merits of ‘Merits’ Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal


Michael Asimow


Stanford Law School

Jeffrey S. Lubbers


American University - Washington College of Law

March 14, 2011

Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Forthcoming
Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1785894
American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2011-10

Abstract:     
This article compares several systems of administrative adjudication. In the U.S., adjudication is typically performed by the same agency that makes and enforces the rules. However, in Australia, almost all administrative adjudication is performed by the Administrative Appeals Tribunal (AAT), a non-specialized adjudicating agency, and several other specialized tribunals that are independent of the enforcing agency. These tribunals (which evolved out of concerns about separation of powers) have achieved great legitimacy. In the U.K., recent legislation (the Tribunals, Courts and Enforcement Act) merged numerous specialized tribunals into a single first-tier tribunal with much stronger guarantees of independence than previously existed. An upper tribunal hears appeals from the first tier and largely supplants judicial review. The article concludes by asking whether the U.S. could learn anything from the Australian and U.K. experience and suggests that a single tribunal to adjudicate federal benefits cases might be a significant improvement over the existing model.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: Administrative Law, Comparative Law, Administrative Adjudication, Administrative Appeals Tribunal, AAT, Tribunals Courts and Enforcement Act

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Asimow, Michael and Lubbers, Jeffrey S., The Merits of ‘Merits’ Review: A Comparative Look at the Australian Administrative Appeals Tribunal (March 14, 2011). Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice, Forthcoming; Stanford Public Law Working Paper No. 1785894; American University, WCL Research Paper No. 2011-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1785894

Contact Information

Michael R. Asimow (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School ( email )
559 Nathan Abbott Way
Room 241
Stanford, CA 94305-8610
United States
650-723-2431 (Phone)
650-725-0253 (Fax)
Jeffrey S. Lubbers
American University - Washington College of Law ( email )
4801 Massachusetts Avenue N.W.
Washington, DC 20016
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 720
Downloads: 136
Download Rank: 124,839

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo2 in 0.265 seconds