Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1786918
 
 

References (5)



 


 



Collective Punishment: A Coordination Account of Legal Order


Gillian K. Hadfield


USC Law School and Department of Economics

Barry R. Weingast


Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace

March 1, 2011

USC CLEO Research Paper No. C11-4
USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 11-9

Abstract:     
Although most economic and positive political theory presumes the existence of an effective legal regime (protecting property rights or implementing legislative or judicial choices, for example), behavioral social science has devoted little systematic attention to the question of what constitutes distinctively legal order. Most social scientists take for granted that law is defined by the presence of a centralized authority capable of exacting coercive penalties for violations of legal rules. This unexamined presumption, however, leaves us with few tools in social science to answer key questions about the emergence and maintenance of legal order. A focus on centralized coercion fails to distinguish between spontaneous social order based on social norms and deliberate order structured by organized efforts to create and enforce rules in the absence of centralized coercion. In this paper we discuss several settings in which centralized coercive force is absent and yet social order relies on distinctively legal attributes and institutions. Drawing on a model developed in Hadfield & Weingast (2011), we use these settings to show how distinctively legal attributes and institutions work to coordinate decentralized collective punishment. We focus in particular on how legal institutions reduce ambiguity and solve incentive problems to support a decentralized equilibrium characterized by compliance with deliberately chosen rules. We thus sketch out how a social scientific account of law can help distinguish social norms from legal rules and identify the institutions that support legal order in a wide range of settings that do not presume the existence of centralized coercion.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 37

Keywords: legal order, rule of law, concept of law, collective punishment, coordination, focal points, coercion

JEL Classification: D63, D72, K40, K00

working papers series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2011 ; Last revised: November 12, 2013

Suggested Citation

Hadfield, Gillian K. and Weingast, Barry R., Collective Punishment: A Coordination Account of Legal Order (March 1, 2011). USC CLEO Research Paper No. C11-4; USC Law Legal Studies Paper No. 11-9. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1786918 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1786918

Contact Information

Gillian K. Hadfield (Contact Author)
USC Law School and Department of Economics ( email )
699 Exposition Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90089
United States
213-821-6793 (Phone)
213-740-5502 (Fax)

Barry R. Weingast
Stanford University - The Hoover Institution on War, Revolution and Peace ( email )
Stanford, CA 94305-6010
United States
650-723-0497 (Phone)
650-723-1808 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://https://www.stanford.edu/group/mcnollgast/cgi-bin/wordpress/
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,005
Downloads: 159
Download Rank: 110,367
References:  5

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.313 seconds