|
||||
|
||||
CEO Director Connections and Corporate FraudN.K. ChidambaranFordham University - Schools of Business Simi KediaRutgers Business School Nagpurnanand R. PrabhalaUniversity of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business March 15, 2011 Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper No. 1787500 Abstract: We study the propensity of firms to commit financial fraud using a sample of SEC enforcement actions from 2000 to 2006. Controlling for several rm characteristics as well as year and Fama-French 48-industry effects, we find a significant relation between fraud probability and CEO-board connectedness. The nature of this relation depends on the institutional origin of the connection. While nonprofessional connectedness due to shared educational and non-business antecedents increase fraud probability, professional connections formed due to common prior employment decrease fraud. The positive effects of professional connectedness are pronounced only when individuals share service as executives. The impact of professional-connections persists after the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act while nonprofessional connections lose significance after SOX. Our results suggest that social ties matter and they can have very different effects depending on the institutional context in which the ties are formed. The results suggest heterogeneity in monitoring even within the set of independent directors and support a complementary collaborative board perspective in which directors not only monitor but also provide advice and counsel to CEOs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44 working papers seriesDate posted: March 22, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.734 seconds