CEO Director Connections and Corporate Fraud
Fordham University - Schools of Business
Rutgers Business School
University of Maryland - Robert H. Smith School of Business; CAFRAL
March 15, 2011
Fordham University Schools of Business Research Paper No. 1787500
We study the propensity of firms to commit financial fraud using a sample of SEC enforcement actions from 2000 to 2006. Controlling for several rm characteristics as well as year and Fama-French 48-industry effects, we find a significant relation between fraud probability and CEO-board connectedness. The nature of this relation depends on the institutional origin of the connection. While nonprofessional connectedness due to shared educational and non-business antecedents increase fraud probability, professional connections formed due to common prior employment decrease fraud. The positive effects of professional connectedness are pronounced only when individuals share service as executives. The impact of professional-connections persists after the 2002 Sarbanes-Oxley Act while nonprofessional connections lose significance after SOX. Our results suggest that social ties matter and they can have very different effects depending on the institutional context in which the ties are formed. The results suggest heterogeneity in monitoring even within the set of independent directors and support a complementary collaborative board perspective in which directors not only monitor but also provide advice and counsel to CEOs.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 44
Date posted: March 22, 2011
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.437 seconds