Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1788764
 
 

Footnotes (203)



 


 



Rethinking Miranda: The Post-Arrest Right to Silence


Stephen Rushin


University of Illinois College of Law; University of California, Berkeley - Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program


California Law Review, Vol. 99, p. 151, 2011

Abstract:     
Some scholars have recently observed that Miranda protections are under attack. At its core, Miranda requires law enforcement to inform a criminal suspect of her constitutional rights before custodial interrogation in order to protect her privilege against self-incrimination. But today, Miranda warnings inform individuals of only a small subset of their actual Fifth Amendment rights, partially due to ambiguity in the current doctrine. Perhaps no area of Fifth Amendment doctrine is more ambiguous than a suspect’s right to silence during post-arrest interrogation.

This Comment explores the selective invocation of the right to silence during custodial interrogations. I define selective invocation as the ability of a suspect to exercise her right to silence on a question-to-question basis after an earlier waiver of Miranda rights. State and federal courts have split on the issue of whether a criminal suspect may selectively invoke the right to silence in this way. I argue, however, that a rule permitting criminal suspects to selectively invoke the right to silence accords with constitutional doctrine and public policy considerations. Further, I argue that suspects ought to bear the burden to explicitly invoke the right to silence during interrogation. Lastly, to avoid due process concerns arising from such burdens on suspects, I argue Miranda warnings should be expanded to bridge the current information asymmetry between law enforcement and citizenry. In total, I contend that these policy proposals would benefit law enforcement and comprehensively protect a criminal suspect’s Fifth Amendment rights.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 28

Keywords: Selective Invocation, Self-Incrimination, Miranda, Interrogation, Fifth Amendment

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 20, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Rushin, Stephen, Rethinking Miranda: The Post-Arrest Right to Silence. California Law Review, Vol. 99, p. 151, 2011. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1788764

Contact Information

Stephen Rushin (Contact Author)
University of Illinois College of Law ( email )
504 E. Pennsylvania Avenue
Champaign, IL 61820
United States
217-244-6015 (Phone)

University of California, Berkeley - Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program ( email )
Berkeley, CA 94720-7200
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 930
Downloads: 151
Download Rank: 114,309
Footnotes:  203

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.282 seconds