Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1789009
 
 

Footnotes (252)



 


 



From Colorblindness to Antibalkanization: An Emerging Ground of Decision in Race Equality Cases


Reva Siegel


Yale University - Law School

March 1, 2011

Yale Law Journal, Vol. 120, p. 1278, 2011
Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 225

Abstract:     
For decades, the Supreme Court has sharply divided in equal protection race discrimination cases. As commonly described, the Justices disagree about whether the Equal Protection Clause is properly interpreted through a colorblind anticlassification principle concerned with individualism or through an antisubordination principle concerned with inequalities in group status. This Article uncovers a third perspective on equal protection in the opinions of swing Justices who have voted to uphold and to restrict race conscious remedies because of concern about social divisiveness which, they believe, both extreme racial stratification and unconstrained racial remedies can engender. The Article terms this third perspective on equal protection concerned with threats to social cohesion the antibalkanization perspective.

Employing this triadic model of equal protection, the Article demonstrates how Justice Kennedy reasons from antibalkanization values in the recent cases of Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 and Ricci v. DeStefano. There Justice Kennedy affirms race-conscious facially neutral laws that promote equal opportunity (such as disparate impact claims in employment discrimination laws) so long as the enforcement of such laws does not make race salient in ways that affront dignity and threaten divisiveness.

The Article’s triadic model identifies alternative directions equal protection doctrine might develop, and enables critique. A final section raises questions concerning the principle’s logic and application. Have those who interpret equal protection with attention to balkanization enforced the principle in an effective and evenhanded way? In this spirit, the Article concludes by suggesting that the antibalkanization principle could be applied to cases of concern to minority communities that do not involve challenges to civil rights laws (for example, government use of race in suspect apprehension).

Number of Pages in PDF File: 91

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 19, 2011 ; Last revised: March 30, 2011

Suggested Citation

Siegel, Reva, From Colorblindness to Antibalkanization: An Emerging Ground of Decision in Race Equality Cases (March 1, 2011). Yale Law Journal, Vol. 120, p. 1278, 2011; Yale Law School, Public Law Working Paper No. 225. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1789009

Contact Information

Reva B. Siegel (Contact Author)
Yale University - Law School ( email )
P.O. Box 208215
New Haven, CT 06520-8215
United States
203-432-6791 (Phone)
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,747
Downloads: 356
Download Rank: 44,572
Footnotes:  252

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.375 seconds