Outsourcing Criminal Prosecution?: The Limits of Criminal Justice Privatization
George Washington University - Law School
University of Chicago Legal Forum, Vol. 2010, p. 265, 2010
GWU Legal Studies Research Paper No. 541
GWU Law School Public Law Research Paper No. 541
In an era of scarce public resources, many jurisdictions are being forced to take drastic measures to address severe budgetary constraints on the administration of criminal justice. As prosecutors’ offices around the nation are being scaled back and enforcement priorities are being narrowed, one conceivable response is the outsourcing of the criminal prosecution function to private lawyers. Indeed, prosecution outsourcing currently is utilized in surprising measure by jurisdictions in the United States. This Article, prepared for the University of Chicago Legal Forum Symposium on Crime, Criminal Law, and the Recession, argues that the outsourcing trend in criminal justice – seen most prominently in the area of private prisons and policing – should not extend to criminal prosecution because such outsourcing is in tension with the constitutional and positive law norms regulating the public-private distinction. Furthermore, concerns about ethics, fairness, transparency, accountability, performance, and the important values advanced by the public prosecution norm all militate against the outsourcing of the criminal prosecution function to private lawyers.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 34
Keywords: privatization, prosecutors, discretion
JEL Classification: K14, K41, K42, H57
Date posted: March 24, 2011
© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 1.578 seconds