Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1790742
 
 

Footnotes (225)



 


 



Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study


Justin D. Levinson


University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law

Danielle Young


University of Hawaii at Manoa - Department of Psychology

August 1, 2010

Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010

Abstract:     
Commentators have marveled at the continuing lack of gender diversity in the legal profession’s most influential and honored positions. After achieving near equal numbers of male and female law school graduates for approximately two decades, the gap between men and women in law firms, legal academia, and the judiciary remains stark. Several scholars have argued that due to negative stereotypes portraying women either as workplace cutthroats or, conversely, as secretaries or housewives, decision-makers continue to subordinate women to men in the highest levels of the legal profession. Despite these compelling arguments, no empirical studies have tested whether implicit gender bias might explain the disproportionately low number of women attorneys in leadership roles.

In order to test the hypothesis that implicit gender bias drives the continued subordination of women in the legal profession, we designed and conducted an empirical study. The study tested whether law students hold implicit gender biases related to women in the legal profession, and further tested whether these implicit biases predict discriminatory decision-making. The results of the study were both concerning and hopeful. As predicted, we found that implicit biases were pervasive; a diverse group of both male and female law students implicitly associated judges with men, not women, and also associated women with the home and family. Yet the results of the remaining portions of the study offered hope. Participants were frequently able to resist their implicit biases and make decisions in gender neutral ways. Taken together, the results of the study highlight two conflicting sides of the ongoing gender debate: first, that the power of implicit gender biases persists, even in the next generation of lawyers; and second, that the emergence of a new generation of egalitarian law students may offer some hope for the future.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 44

Keywords: gender bias, implicit bias, judicial selection, implicit associations, gender stereotypes, empirical legal studies

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 21, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Levinson, Justin D. and Young, Danielle, Implicit Gender Bias in the Legal Profession: An Empirical Study (August 1, 2010). Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, Vol. 18, No. 1, 2010. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1790742

Contact Information

Justin D. Levinson (Contact Author)
University of Hawaii at Manoa - William S. Richardson School of Law ( email )
2515 Dole Street
Honolulu, HI 96822
United States
Danielle Young
University of Hawaii at Manoa - Department of Psychology ( email )
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,560
Downloads: 300
Download Rank: 57,928
Footnotes:  225
Paper comments
No comments have been made on this paper

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.407 seconds