Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791125
 
 

Footnotes (430)



 


 



First Amendment Architecture


Marvin Ammori


Stanford Law School--Center for Internet & Society; New America Foundation--Open Technology Initiative

March 11, 2011

Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2012, No. 1, 2012

Abstract:     
The right to free speech is meaningless without some place to exercise it. But constitutional scholarship generally overlooks the role that judicial doctrine plays in ensuring the availability of spaces for speech. Indeed, scholarship generally characterizes doctrines that are concerned with speech spaces, such as public forums and Internet forums, as “exceptions” to “standard” First Amendment analysis. In response to normative arguments that the First Amendment should be concerned with ample speech spaces, many scholars simply respond with a descriptive claim about what doctrine currently is: they claim that the concern for spaces is only peripheral, “exceptional,” and at odds with “standard” First Amendment understandings. By overlooking or marginalizing decisions about speech spaces, as well as relying on this descriptive characterization of doctrine to reject normative arguments, scholarship has failed to recognize the logic underlying important doctrinal areas and has failed to explore what these doctrines reveal about the First Amendment’s core normative underpinnings.

This Article adopts a different approach. Rather than making the descriptive assumption that free speech doctrine is unconcerned with spaces, this Article identifies and interprets the Court’s role in ensuring, requiring, or permitting government to make spaces available for speech. This Article identifies five persistent judicial principles across a range of physical and virtual spaces. These principles are evident in precedent and practice that either require or permit government to ensure spaces for speech — in order to promote particular, substantive speech goals. Further, rather than quarantining these speech principles as exceptions to the “standard” analysis, this Article explores the significance of these principles for “core” speech doctrine and theory. The resulting analysis poses fundamental challenges to conventional wisdom about the First Amendment and the normative principles generally believed evident in doctrine. This Article provides timely guidance for legislators and judges, as it should inform statutory and constitutional decisions for shaping access to the technology enabled virtual spaces increasingly central to Americans’ discourse, to our liberty, and to our democracy.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 83

Keywords: First Amendment, Negative Liberty, Network Neutrality, Speech Spaces

Accepted Paper Series





Download This Paper

Date posted: March 23, 2011 ; Last revised: March 29, 2012

Suggested Citation

Ammori, Marvin, First Amendment Architecture (March 11, 2011). Wisconsin Law Review, Vol. 2012, No. 1, 2012. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791125

Contact Information

Marvin Ammori (Contact Author)
Stanford Law School--Center for Internet & Society ( email )
Palo Alto, CA
United States
New America Foundation--Open Technology Initiative ( email )
921 11th Street, Suite 901
Sacramento, CA USA 95814
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 8,746
Downloads: 620
Download Rank: 23,390
Footnotes:  430

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo5 in 0.375 seconds