Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791130
 
 

Footnotes (24)



 


 



Redemption Song: Graham v. Florida and the Evolving Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence


Robert J. Smith


University of North Carolina School of Law

G. Ben Cohen


The Justice Center's Capital Appeals Project

June 20, 2010

Michigan Law Review First Impressions, Vol. 108, p. 86, 2010

Abstract:     
In Graham v. Florida, the Supreme Court held that the Eighth Amendment prohibits a sentence of life without parole ("LWOP") for a juvenile under eighteen who commits a non-homicide offense. For Terrance Graham, who committed home-invasion robbery at seventeen, the decision does not mean necessarily that he someday will leave the brick walls of Florida's Taylor Annex Correctional Institution. Unlike previous Eighth Amendment decisions, such as Roper v. Simmons, where the Court barred the death penalty for juveniles, this new categorical rule does not translate into automatic relief for members of the exempted class: "A State need not guarantee the offender eventual release," Justice Kennedy wrote for the majority, "but if it imposes a sentence of life it must provide him or her with some realistic opportunity to obtain release before the end of that term." Graham offers the possibility of redemption but not its guarantee.

Pragmatists are understandably skeptical.Yet beyond the narrow application of this rule to the small class of child-offenders, Graham contains the ingredients to be of transformative significance to the Supreme Court's Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. First, the opinion - employing a method of comparative analysis typically reserved for its capital cases - cements a proportionality requirement in the Court's non-capital Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. Second, the Court uses for the first time a method of constitutional elucidation that draws two separate and seemingly parallel lines of jurisprudence together to articulate an independent constitutional principle. Third, the Court articulates the "possibility of redemption" as an essential consideration arising from evolving standards of decency. These three components - proportionality, constitutional triangulation, and the notion that people and their propensities are not static - suggest that Graham could have far greater significance in the life of the law than in the life of child defendants toiling, for instance, in the fields of the Florida Penitentiary.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 9

Keywords: graham, juvenile, lwop, death penalty, eighth amendment, evolving standards of decency

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 23, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Smith, Robert J. and Cohen, G. Ben, Redemption Song: Graham v. Florida and the Evolving Eighth Amendment Jurisprudence (June 20, 2010). Michigan Law Review First Impressions, Vol. 108, p. 86, 2010 . Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791130

Contact Information

Robert J. Smith (Contact Author)
University of North Carolina School of Law ( email )
Chapel Hill, NC 27599
United States
G. Ben Cohen
The Justice Center's Capital Appeals Project ( email )
636 Baronne St.
New Orleans, LA 70113
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 1,029
Downloads: 125
Download Rank: 133,151
Footnotes:  24

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.234 seconds