Footnotes (90)



Reason, the Common Law, and the Living Constitution

Matthew Steilen

SUNY Buffalo Law School

February 1, 2011

Legal Theory, Volume 17, Issue 4

This article reviews David Strauss’s recent book, The Living Constitution. The thesis of Strauss’s book is that constitutional law is a kind of common law, based largely on judicial precedent and common-sense judgments about what works and what is fair. Strauss argues constitutional doctrines prohibiting discrimination and protecting free speech have a common law basis, and that the originalist would have to reject them. However, it is unclear that the common law can justify these rights. This review examines Strauss’s account of the common law and shows why it cannot justify our First Amendment protections of subversive advocacy, as Strauss argues it does. The review then offers an alternative account of the common law based on the “classical” common law theory associated with Coke, Hale, and Blackstone.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 42

Keywords: Living Constitution, Common Law, Common Law Constitutionalism, Jurisprudence, David Strauss, First Amendment, Subversive Advocacy

Accepted Paper Series

Download This Paper

Date posted: March 22, 2011 ; Last revised: March 25, 2014

Suggested Citation

Steilen, Matthew, Reason, the Common Law, and the Living Constitution (February 1, 2011). Legal Theory, Volume 17, Issue 4. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1791751

Contact Information

Matthew J. Steilen (Contact Author)
SUNY Buffalo Law School ( email )
John Lord O'Brian Hall
Buffalo, NY 14260
United States
Feedback to SSRN

Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 992
Downloads: 164
Download Rank: 111,137
Footnotes:  90

© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.297 seconds