|
||||
|
||||
The Law and Policy of Judicial Retirement: An Empirical StudyStephen J. ChoiNew York University School of Law G. Mitu GulatiDuke University - School of Law Eric A. PosnerUniversity of Chicago - Law School March 22, 2011 NYU Law and Economics Research Paper No. 11-12 NYU School of Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 11-24 U of Chicago Institute for Law & Economics Olin Research Paper No. 550 Abstract: Lifetime tenure maximizes judicial independence by shielding judges from political pressures, but it creates problems of its own. Judges with independence may implement their political preferences. Judges may remain in office after their abilities degrade with age. The U.S. federal system addresses these problems in an indirect way. When judges’ pensions vest, they receive a full salary regardless of whether they work. Judges can retire, receive their pension, and obtain paying work elsewhere. This limits some of the harmful effects of judicial independence by encouraging judges to vacate their offices when they become old, and by causing judges who lack talent, and therefore find their work burdensome, to leave office. We test the benefits and costs of this system using a database of federal district judges. We find that the vesting system causes judges to retire as expected, but that higher-quality and wealthier judges are less sensitive to the financial incentives of the system; and that some judges appear to time retirement so that the president will appoint likeminded judges.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 55 Keywords: courts, judges, pension, judicial retirement, rule of 80, judge incentives JEL Classification: K41 working papers seriesDate posted: March 27, 2011 ; Last revised: November 2, 2011Suggested CitationContact Information
|
|
||||||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo6 in 0.422 seconds