Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792639
 
 

References (41)



 
 

Citations (3)



 


 



Measuring Real Activity Management


Daniel A. Cohen


University of Texas at Dallas - Naveen Jindal School of Management

Shail Pandit


University of Illinois at Chicago

Charles E. Wasley


University of Rochester - Simon Business School

Tzachi Zach


Ohio State University (OSU) - Fisher College of Business

August 5, 2016


Abstract:     
Much recent research focuses on earnings management via managers' manipulation of real activities (real earnings management, REM). While tests of abnormal REM hinge critically on the measurement of normal real activities, there is no systematic evidence on the properties of commonly used REM measures. We provide such evidence by documenting which REM measures lead to well-specified hypotheses tests. We find that the REM measures used to date in the literature, as well as those we develop to capture variation in expected real activities due to characteristics of firms’ investment opportunity sets, or to control for non-linearity in the relation between performance and expected real activities, are severely mis-specified in that their Type I error rates differ significantly from nominal significance levels. While performance-matched REM measures are not well specified in each and every setting (no REM measure is), the weight of the evidence suggests that, across a wide variety of research settings such as those encountered in accounting, performance-matched REM measures will provide better-specified tests than other REM measures. Such evidence highlights the importance of using performance-matched REM measures, when testing hypotheses related to managers’ incentives to manipulate real activities, to ensure that reliable inferences are drawn.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 54

Keywords: Real activity management, real earnings management, earnings management, real activity models, test specification, meet or beat, earnings benchmarks, model specification

JEL Classification: M41, C12, C15, M42


Open PDF in Browser Download This Paper

Date posted: March 24, 2011 ; Last revised: August 6, 2016

Suggested Citation

Cohen, Daniel A. and Pandit, Shail and Wasley, Charles E. and Zach, Tzachi, Measuring Real Activity Management (August 5, 2016). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792639 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1792639

Contact Information

Daniel A. Cohen
University of Texas at Dallas - Naveen Jindal School of Management ( email )
P.O. Box 830688
Richardson, TX 75083-0688
United States
972-883-4772 (Phone)
972-883-6811 (Fax)
Shailendra Pandit
University of Illinois at Chicago ( email )
601 South Morgan Street
University Hall, Room 2303
Chicago, IL 60607
United States
(312) 355-1331 (Phone)
(312) 996-4520 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://business.uic.edu/faculty/shailendra-shail-pandit
Charles E. Wasley
University of Rochester - Simon Business School ( email )
Rochester, NY 14627
United States
585-275-3362 (Phone)
585-442-6323 (Fax)

Tzachi Zach (Contact Author)
Ohio State University (OSU) - Fisher College of Business ( email )
2100 Neil Avenue
Columbus, OH 43210-1144
United States
614-292-4101 (Phone)

Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 6,028
Downloads: 1,707
Download Rank: 6,444
References:  41
Citations:  3

© 2016 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollobot1 in 2.141 seconds