Unintended Consequences of Lowering Disclosure Thresholds
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Christopher P. Agoglia
University of Massachusetts at Amherst
M. David Piercey
University of Massachusetts Amherst
April 24, 2014
Accounting Review, Forthcoming
In recent years, regulators have considered several initiatives to lower the threshold for disclosing risks to investors. We examine two ways in which disclosing more risks can actually lower investors’ perceptions of risk. Utilizing an experiment, we find evidence of two unintended consequences on different types of investors. First, we demonstrate that the addition of low-probability risks to a disclosure can dilute (rather than add to) more probable losses, leading certain investors to lower their perceptions of overall risk. Second, since lowering the threshold changes the overall composition of the disclosure by adding low-probability losses, firms could adopt a tactic of minimization that characterizes the entire disclosure as unimportant, presenting the lowest risks most saliently, using compliance with the low threshold as a plausible reason for giving a lengthy disclosure of generally unimportant risks. Our findings suggest that such a tactic can be persuasive.
Keywords: disclosure thresholds; dilution effect; persuasion tactics; investor judgment
JEL Classification: C91, M40, M41, M49
Date posted: March 27, 2011 ; Last revised: July 1, 2014
© 2015 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.250 seconds