Abstract

 
 

Footnotes (348)



 


 



The Dialectic of Obscenity


Brian L. Frye


University of Kentucky - College of Law

March 22, 2011

35 Hamline Law Review 229
Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-10

Abstract:     
The story of Jack Smith’s film Flaming Creatures and the “Fortas Film Festival” illustrates the dialectic of obscenity. The obscenity doctrine expresses the conventional wisdom that the First Amendment actually protects art, and protects pornography only by extension. But Flaming Creatures and the Fortas Film Festival suggest that obscenity is dialectical. The obscenity doctrine provides the thesis: art protects pornography, by justifying the protection of sexual expression. Flaming Creatures and the Fortas Film Festival provide the antithesis: pornography protects art, by normalizing sexual expression. The history of obscenity law provides the synthesis: art and pornography protect each other. In other words, art transgresses and pornography reifies.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 50

Keywords: obscenity, cinema, avant-garde, film, movie, Fortas, thurmond, Johnson, LBJ, Warren, pandering

JEL Classification: K10

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 24, 2011 ; Last revised: April 9, 2012

Suggested Citation

Frye, Brian L., The Dialectic of Obscenity (March 22, 2011). 35 Hamline Law Review 229; Hofstra Univ. Legal Studies Research Paper No. 11-10. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792810 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1792810

Contact Information

Brian L. Frye (Contact Author)
University of Kentucky - College of Law ( email )
620 S. Limestone Street
Lexington, KY 40506-0048
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 799
Downloads: 139
Download Rank: 105,699
Footnotes:  348

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo4 in 0.547 seconds