Abstract

http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792824
 
 

Footnotes (85)



 


 



Rules, Standards, and Geeks


Derek E. Bambauer


University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law

March 22, 2011

Brooklyn Journal of Corporate Finance & Commercial Law, Vol. 5, p. 49, 2011
Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 223

Abstract:     
Policymakers and scholars generally assume that information technology is best regulated using standards, not rules. This Article argues that rules are often the superior choice. Those favoring standards typically focus on the wrong problem: they seek to prevent data spills, rather than to mitigate their impact. Rules can helpfully reduce a breach's effects. For technology, rules are preferable when they can specify a minimum level of protection that is relatively effective; where obsolescence occurs slowly; and where monitoring implementation is low-cost and accurate. The Article sets out examples of where each type of approach is superior. Application design is best governed by standards, while the transport and storage of data, along with identification of access to information, are best dealt with via rules. The Article questions the prevailing consensus in favor of standards for regulating technology, and also seeks to create testable predictions about when rules will work better.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 15

Keywords: rules, standards, encryption, data security, privacy, technology, hacking, data spill, breach, mitigate, storage, application, design, efficiency, cost-effectiveness, information

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: March 27, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Bambauer, Derek E., Rules, Standards, and Geeks (March 22, 2011). Brooklyn Journal of Corporate Finance & Commercial Law, Vol. 5, p. 49, 2011 ; Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 223. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1792824

Contact Information

Derek E. Bambauer (Contact Author)
University of Arizona - James E. Rogers College of Law ( email )
P.O. Box 210176
Tucson, AZ 85721-0176
United States
Feedback to SSRN


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 538
Downloads: 113
Download Rank: 142,178
Footnotes:  85

© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright   Contact Us
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.390 seconds