|
||||
|
||||
Current Directions in Violence Risk AssessmentJennifer L. SkeemUniversity of California, Irvine John MonahanUniversity of Virginia School of Law March 23, 2011 Current Directions in Psychological Science, Forthcoming Virginia Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper No. 2011-13 Abstract: A variety of instruments have been published over recent years that improve clinicians’ ability to forecast the likelihood that an individual will behave violently. Increasingly, these instruments are being applied in response to laws that require specialized risk assessments. In this article, we present a framework that goes beyond the "clinical" and "actuarial" dichotomy to describe a continuum of structured approaches to risk assessment. Despite differences among them, there is little evidence that one validated instrument predicts violence better than another. We believe that these group-based instruments are useful for assessing an individual’s risk, and that an instrument should be chosen based on an evaluation’s purpose (i.e., risk assessment vs. risk reduction). The time is ripe to shift attention from predicting violence to understanding its causes and preventing its (re)occurrence.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 16 Keywords: violence, risk assessment, risk reduction Accepted Paper SeriesDate posted: March 25, 2011Suggested Citation |
|
|||||||||||||
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FAQ
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Copyright
This page was processed by apollo8 in 0.359 seconds