Experimenting on Law Students: Why Imposing no Ethical Constraints on Educational Research Using Law Students is a Bad Idea and Proposed Ethical Guidelines
Florida Coastal School of Law
December 1, 2010
Southwestern University Law Review, Vol. 40, p. 285, 2010
Under current federal regulations, law school faculties are permitted to engage in human research using students as subjects with little or no ethical oversight. This freewheeling environment runs counter to well-established ethical guidelines for human research and to law professors’ heightened moral duties as members of the Bar and the legal academy. In addition, it exposes students, law faculty, and the legal academy to risks arising out of the use of unregulated human experimentation in law schools. This is inimical to morally good practice. To remedy this ethical problem, this article provides a set of guidelines for law professors who wish to ethically engage in empirical research using students as subjects.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 36
Keywords: human research, human experimentation, law students, law teaching, law school, education, research, ethics, rules of professional responsibility, institutional review board, IRB
JEL Classification: K19, I21, I29Accepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 26, 2011
© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo7 in 0.547 seconds