Note, When a Company Confesses
Law Clerk, U.S. Court of Appeals; University of Michigan Law School
December 1, 2010
Michigan Law Review, Vol. 109, No. 3, 2010
Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant is normally obligated to attend all of the proceedings against her. However, Rule 43(b)(2) carves out an exception for organizational defendants, stating that they “need not be present” if represented by an attorney. But on its face, the language of 43(b)(2) is ambiguous: is it the defendant or the judge who has the discretion to decide whether the defendant appears? That is, may a judge compel the presence of an organizational defendant? This Note addresses the ambiguity in the context of the plea colloquy, considering the text of several of the Rules, the purposes behind the plea colloquy proceeding, and the inherent powers doctrine. It argues that district court judges do in fact have the authority to compel an organizational defendant’s presence at a plea colloquy.
Number of Pages in PDF File: 28
Keywords: Criminal procedure, corporate, criminal law, federal rules of criminal procedure, statutory interpretation, inherent powers, guilty plea, plea colloquyAccepted Paper Series
Date posted: March 29, 2011
© 2014 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
This page was processed by apollo3 in 0.343 seconds