Abstract

 


 



Allocations of Joint and Common Costs


Gary C. Biddle


The University of Hong Kong

Richard Steinberg


Columbia University

Spring 1984

Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 3, 1984

Abstract:     
Although there exists an extensive and growing literature on how firms should and should not allocate costs, this literature has had only a limited impact on cost allocation practices. A possible explanation is that cost allocation proposals have not always captured essential aspects of the settings in which demands for allocations arise. Another explanation relates to this literature's diversity. The varied and sometimes conflicting assumptions, definitions, and methodologies that the alternative approaches employ have made comparisons difficult for managers and researchers alike.

Through a critique and synthesis of the major streams of cost allocation research, this study provides a concise and nontechnical overview. Its critical review of previous studies provides a framework for future research which emphasizes a necessary correspondence between allocation methods and management decisions.

Number of Pages in PDF File: 45

Accepted Paper Series


Download This Paper

Date posted: June 13, 2011  

Suggested Citation

Biddle, Gary C. and Steinberg, Richard, Allocations of Joint and Common Costs (Spring 1984). Journal of Accounting Literature, Vol. 3, 1984. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1797371

Contact Information

Gary C. Biddle (Contact Author)
The University of Hong Kong ( email )
1213 KK Leung Building
Pokfulam
Hong Kong
China
+852 3917-4388 (Phone)
+852 2858-5614 (Fax)
HOME PAGE: http://www.fbe.hku.hk/Aboutus/Staff_Detail.cfm?StaffID=315
Richard Steinberg
Columbia University ( email )
3022 Broadway
New York, NY 10027
United States
Feedback to SSRN (Beta)


Paper statistics
Abstract Views: 289
Downloads: 71
Download Rank: 169,659

© 2013 Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. All Rights Reserved.  FAQ   Terms of Use   Privacy Policy   Copyright
This page was processed by apollo1 in 0.390 seconds